← Back to Blog
Scam Alert11 min read

FTC 2026 Robocall Data: What DNC Complaints Reveal

Vindication Security Team
Telecommunications Threat Analysts
Reviewed by Umer Mustafa
FTC 2026 Robocall Data: What DNC Complaints Reveal

Quick Answer

The FTC's 2026 Do Not Call Registry report reveals over 2.6 million consumer complaints, with imposter scams (impersonating banks, Medicare, and government agencies) accounting for over 55% of all reported robocalls. Illegal VoIP autodialers bypass DNC rules because operators operate outside US jurisdiction.

The Federal Trade Commission received over 2.6 million Do Not Call complaints in fiscal year 2025, according to the FY2025 National Do Not Call Registry Data Book published in December 2025. This figure covers DNC-specific complaints only — the broader FTC Consumer Sentinel Network recorded approximately 5.7 million total fraud reports across all categories in the same period. The DNC number is down from its peak, but fraud losses hit $15.9B (see our 2026 robocall statistics summary). While Do Not Call Registry effectiveness is limited against criminal autodialers, families can deploy on-device tools when protecting elderly parents from scams.

Key Statistics From the FTC's FY2025 Data

All figures sourced from the FTC FY2025 National Do Not Call Registry Data Book, published December 2025.

Metric Value Period
DNC Complaints Received 2.6 million+ FY2025 (Oct 2024 – Sep 2025)
Total Consumer Fraud Losses $15.9 billion Calendar Year 2025
Active DNC Registrations 258 million+ End of FY2025
Complaint Volume Decline (from peak) -48% Since FY2021 peak
Fraud Loss Increase (YoY) +30% 2024 vs 2025
Senior Median Loss Per Scam (70+) $1,450 FY2025
#1 Complaint Category Imposter Scams FY2025

What is the breakdown by scam type?

The FTC's Consumer Sentinel Network data categorizes complaints by the type of solicitation reported. The top categories for FY2025:

  1. Debt reduction / financial services: Callers offering fake debt consolidation, student loan forgiveness, or credit score improvement schemes. This category consistently ranks first and typically targets people who have expressed financial distress in any publicly accessible data source.
  2. Imposter scams (government, business, family): Calls impersonating the IRS, Social Security Administration, Medicare, or family members in distress. AI voice cloning has dramatically amplified the effectiveness of family impersonation scams in 2025–2026.
  3. Medical and prescription schemes: Callers offering free medical equipment, Medicare supplemental coverage, or prescription drug discounts. These target seniors disproportionately and are frequently used to harvest Medicare ID numbers and Social Security data.
  4. Energy, solar, and utilities: Calls claiming to offer government-subsidized solar panels, utility rate reductions, or energy audits. The "green energy" framing has increased uptake among environmentally conscious demographics.
  5. Home improvement and cleaning: Unsolicited calls for roof repair, gutter cleaning, or HVAC services — often used as entry points for home-visit scams or contract fraud targeting homeowners.

Which states have the most robocall complaints?

The FTC measures complaints per 100,000 residents to provide population-adjusted rankings. The states with the highest complaint rates in FY2025:

  1. Arizona — Consistently the highest per-capita complaint state, driven by a large retiree population and high telemarketer activity targeting Sun Belt demographics
  2. Florida — Second highest in population-adjusted complaints; also the state with the highest absolute complaint volume given its size and senior population density
  3. Nevada — High transient population and gaming-adjacent financial services solicitation contribute to elevated complaint rates
  4. Tennessee — Rising complaint rates correlated with increased VoIP-based robocall operations identified in the region
  5. Illinois — Large urban population and high density of reported debt-reduction and imposter scam calls

Note: The FTC publishes full state-by-state data through its Consumer Sentinel Network interactive portal, updated quarterly.

What does the year-over-year decline mean?

The 48% reduction in DNC complaints since FY2021 is real but misleading when taken in isolation. Three things explain the trend:

  • Enforcement against infrastructure: The FTC has aggressively targeted the VoIP providers, dialers, and soundboard technology companies that power high-volume robocall operations. Shutting down infrastructure removes tens of millions of calls from the pipeline simultaneously — more efficient than pursuing individual callers.
  • Reporting fatigue: Consumer research consistently shows that frequent robocall targets stop reporting after their first few complaints, concluding that reporting is ineffective. The actual incident rate is significantly higher than complaint volumes suggest.
  • Scam sophistication: Skilled impersonation scams are less likely to be identified and reported as robocalls. A consumer who loses money to an AI voice cloning scam may not recognize it as a "robocall" and report it to DoNotCall.gov — it might be filed under a different fraud category or not reported at all.

The $15.9 billion fraud loss figure — rising even as complaint volumes fall — reflects this dynamic. Fewer calls, but more effective targeting and higher per-call fraud yield.

What does this data mean for Android users?

Three practical conclusions from the FTC's FY2025 data:

1. The Do Not Call Registry is not a spam call solution. Of the 2.6 million complaints filed in FY2025, virtually none came from people whose phone numbers were not already on the Registry. The Registry has 258 million registrations. The callers generating the complaints are not legitimate telemarketers checking the Registry — they are criminals for whom the Registry is irrelevant.

2. The highest-risk demographics need proactive blocking, not reactive labels. The FTC data is consistent across years: seniors and retirees face disproportionate financial losses per complaint because they are more likely to engage with calls rather than hang up, and more likely to be managing financial decisions (retirement accounts, Medicare, insurance) that scammers can exploit. Carrier-level spam labeling (the "Spam Risk" label on a ringing phone) does not protect a senior who is expecting a call from a new pharmacy or a Medicare administrator.

3. Privacy-invasive call blockers are not the answer to a privacy problem. The FTC's annual data on fraud losses makes clear that phone scammers are sophisticated actors with access to data broker databases, including databases populated by app companies that harvest contact lists. Giving an elderly parent's phone to a call blocker that uploads an entire address book to their servers in exchange for spam protection is a trade that may not serve their interests.

How Do I Report Robocalls to the FTC?

Even if calls are blocked automatically, reporting confirmed robocall numbers to the FTC contributes to aggregate enforcement data. File a complaint at ReportFraud.ftc.gov or DoNotCall.gov. Reports are shared with law enforcement agencies nationwide through the Consumer Sentinel Network. The full FY2025 DNC Data Book and prior years are published at ftc.gov/policy/reports. For app-level privacy data on the call blockers designed to address this problem, see the guide to choosing a private call blocker.

Key Takeaways

  • The FTC receives millions of robocall complaints annually, led by imposter and medical fraud.
  • The Do Not Call Registry only restrains law-abiding telemarketers, not illicit offshore scam networks.
  • Over 65% of reported spam calls use neighbor-spoofed local area codes to bypass basic blocking.
  • Combining regulatory enforcement with local on-device screening offers the most effective spam defense.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the breakdown by scam type?

The FTC's Consumer Sentinel Network data categorizes complaints by the type of solicitation reported. The top categories for FY2025: Debt reduction / financial services: Callers offering fake debt consolidation, student loan forgiveness, or credit score improvement schemes. This category consistently ranks first and typically targets people who have expressed financial distress in any publicly accessible data source. Imposter scams (government, business, family): Calls impersonating the IRS, Social Security Administration, Medicare, or family members in distress. AI voice cloning has dramatically amplified the effectiveness of family impersonation scams in 2025–2026. Medical and prescription schemes: Callers offering free medical equipment, Medicare supplemental coverage, or prescription drug discounts. These target seniors disproportionately and are frequently used to harvest Medicare ID numbers and Social Security data. Energy, solar, and utilities: Calls claiming to offer government-subsidized solar panels, utility rate reductions, or energy audits. The "green energy" framing has increased uptake among environmentally conscious demographics. Home improvement and cleaning: Unsolicited calls for roof repair, gutter cleaning, or HVAC services — often used as entry points for home-visit scams or contract fraud targeting homeowners.

Which states have the most robocall complaints?

The FTC measures complaints per 100,000 residents to provide population-adjusted rankings. The states with the highest complaint rates in FY2025: Arizona — Consistently the highest per-capita complaint state, driven by a large retiree population and high telemarketer activity targeting Sun Belt demographics Florida — Second highest in population-adjusted complaints; also the state with the highest absolute complaint volume given its size and senior population density Nevada — High transient population and gaming-adjacent financial services solicitation contribute to elevated complaint rates Tennessee — Rising complaint rates correlated with increased VoIP-based robocall operations identified in the region Illinois — Large urban population and high density of reported debt-reduction and imposter scam calls Note: The FTC publishes full state-by-state data through its Consumer Sentinel Network interactive portal, updated quarterly.

What does the year-over-year decline mean?

The 48% reduction in DNC complaints since FY2021 is real but misleading when taken in isolation. Three things explain the trend: Enforcement against infrastructure: The FTC has aggressively targeted the VoIP providers, dialers, and soundboard technology companies that power high-volume robocall operations. Shutting down infrastructure removes tens of millions of calls from the pipeline simultaneously — more efficient than pursuing individual callers. Reporting fatigue: Consumer research consistently shows that frequent robocall targets stop reporting after their first few complaints, concluding that reporting is ineffective. The actual incident rate is significantly higher than complaint volumes suggest. Scam sophistication: Skilled impersonation scams are less likely to be identified and reported as robocalls. A consumer who loses money to an AI voice cloning scam may not recognize it as a "robocall" and report it to DoNotCall.gov — it might be filed under a different fraud category or not reported at all. The $15.9 billion fraud loss figure — rising even as complaint volumes fall — reflects this dynamic. Fewer calls, but more effective targeting and higher per-call fraud yield.

What does this data mean for Android users?

Three practical conclusions from the FTC's FY2025 data: 1. The Do Not Call Registry is not a spam call solution. Of the 2.6 million complaints filed in FY2025, virtually none came from people whose phone numbers were not already on the Registry. The Registry has 258 million registrations. The callers generating the complaints are not legitimate telemarketers checking the Registry — they are criminals for whom the Registry is irrelevant. 2. The highest-risk demographics need proactive blocking, not reactive labels. The FTC data is consistent across years: seniors and retirees face disproportionate financial losses per complaint because they are more likely to engage with calls rather than hang up, and more likely to be managing financial decisions (retirement accounts, Medicare, insurance) that scammers can exploit. Carrier-level spam labeling (the "Spam Risk" label on a ringing phone) does not protect a senior who is expecting a call from a new pharmacy or a Medicare administrator. 3. Privacy-invasive call blockers are not the answer to a privacy problem. The FTC's annual data on fraud losses makes clear that phone scammers are sophisticated actors with access to data broker databases, including databases populated by app companies that harvest contact lists. Giving an elderly parent's phone to a call blocker that uploads an entire address book to their servers in exchange for spam protection is a trade that may not serve their interests.

How Do I Report Robocalls to the FTC?

Even if calls are blocked automatically, reporting confirmed robocall numbers to the FTC contributes to aggregate enforcement data. File a complaint at ReportFraud.ftc.gov or DoNotCall.gov. Reports are shared with law enforcement agencies nationwide through the Consumer Sentinel Network. The full FY2025 DNC Data Book and prior years are published at ftc.gov/policy/reports. For app-level privacy data on the call blockers designed to address this problem, see the guide to choosing a private call blocker.

Protect Your Family Today

Install Callro and give your parents a phone that only rings for real people. 7-day free trial — no payment info required.

Get Callro Free →Learn More

Ready for silence?

7 days free. No card needed.